The Great Gatsby By F. Scott Fitzgerald - 1292 Words

The book The Great Gatsby is often taught in high schools around the world. The book was written over 90 years ago, and despite that the book is still very common in high schools. The book if often used to show the beauty and relevance of the character Gatsby and other symbols within the book. The story of Gatsby is set in New York City and on Long Island, within two locations known as West Egg and East Egg. These areas would be the Great Neck and Port Washington peninsulas on Long Island, in real life. The story is set just after World War 1 and in the middle of prohibition, which is actually a big factor in the story as Gatsby makes his money bootlegging; selling illegal alcohol. Gatsby throws these huge grand parties every weekend in†¦show more content†¦This is very unfortunate and is not a good trend that is happening among high school English teachers. The Great Gatsby was published in 1925 and has become one of the biggest pieces of American fiction of its time. The b ook initially was not much of a success but over the years has become a classic piece of American fiction. The book shows how society was during the time in which the book was published. It is because of this the book has become a good way to see how America was back in the 1920s. F. Scott Fitzgerald, the author of The Great Gatsby, is able to preserve how this generation’s political and social ways were during this very historic time period. Politically this time period was a time of growth and prosperity, along with being a time of corruption. World War 1 had ended in 1919, just before the time period that Fitzgerald’s book is in, and Warren G. Harding took presidency in 1920. One of Harding’s major goals was to bring the country back to normal; how it was before the war. Harding’s administration was full of scandals and corruption, and opposition that was fueled by unions and organized crimes. His administration used businesses to rebuild the country, after World War 1. Due to this the administration sided with management in labor disputes over things such as minimum wage, unions, and child labor. Tax legislation also benefited the wealthy more than any other social group as a result of

What Glaucon And The Rest Can Be Separated Into Three Classes

Socrates trusts he has sufficiently reacted to Thrasymachus and is through with the talk of equity, yet the others are not happy with the conclusion they have come to. Glaucon, one of Socrates young partners, clarifies what they might want him to do. Glaucon states that all products can be separated into three classes: things that we crave just for their outcomes, for example, physical preparing and medicinal treatment; things that we fancy just for their own purpose, for example, euphoria; and, the most elevated class, things we fancy both for their own particular purpose and for what we get from them, for example, information, sight, and wellbeing. What Glaucon and the rest might want Socrates to demonstrate is that equity is†¦show more content†¦This story demonstrates that individuals are just barely in light of the fact that they fear discipline for shamefulness. Nobody is on account of equity is attractive in itself. Glaucon closes his discourse with an endeavor to show that not exclusively do individuals like to be out of line instead of just, yet that it is judicious for them to do as such. The impeccably uncalled forever, he contends, is more wonderful than the consummately just life. In making this claim, he draws two point by point pictures of the fair and uncalled for man. The totally treacherous man, who revels every one of his inclinations, is respected and remunerated with riches. The totally simply man, then again, is despised and vomited. His sibling, Adeimantus, softens up and supports Glaucon s contentions by asserting that nobody acclaims equity for its own particular purpose, yet just for the prizes it permits you to procure in both this life and existence in the wake of death. He emphasizes Glaucon s ask for that Socrates indicate equity to be attractive without any outer prizes: that equity is alluring for its own purpose, similar to bliss, wellbeing, and learning. Going ahead the heels of Thrasymachus assault on equity in Book I, the focuses that Glaucon and Adeimantus raise—the social contract hypothesis of equity and the possibility of equity as a cash that purchases compensates in existence in the wake of death—reinforce the test confronted by Socrates toShow MoreRelatedEssay on Platos Theory of Human Nature1029 Words   |  5 Pageseach one of them closely. Plato believed that no one is self-sufficient enough to live individually. Human beings are not created equally; some of us are born wiser then the rest and some of us are just born stronger. For this reason, only the select few (which would be the guardians) among us are supposed to know what is best for the society and therefore becomes the ruler of everyone else. Our reasoning, spirit, and natural wants are all part of human nature. In book 1 of The Republic, PlatoRead More Intangible Justice is in the Soul Essay1352 Words   |  6 PagesIntangible Justice is in the Soul Plato’s Republic, although officially divided into ten books, can be separated into two very distinct sections. The first section, roughly spanning Books I through IV, contains a rather tangible investigation of justice in practice. Namely, the section considers what acts or occurrences are just, either in a city or in a man. The second section, beginning around Book V and continuing through the end of the dialogue, deals with the much more abstract issue ofRead MorePlato and Confucius4610 Words   |  19 PagesSeparated by more than 8500 kilometers but only 52 years, two seminal thinkers have shaped the moral philosophy of their respective cultures. While Western ethical theory has been deeply influenced by Plato’s Republic, Eastern ethical theory has been deeply influenced by Confucius’s Analects. David Haberman describes the Republic as ‘one of the most influential books of all time’ (86). And Bryan Van Norden compares (with considerable fervo r) the Analects to ‘the combined influence of Jesus and Socrates’

Heart

Heart-warming story Essay When writing this play, Russell quoted, The story sounds asif it is a Greek myth but there is no existing story, as far as I know, about twins secretly parted who end up killed on the day they learn the truth about themselves. It feels asif it is a story that has always existed and that is what I wanted to create. This generally explains what Russell wanted his audience to understand; in order to do this, he finds various ways to keep them interested yet hanging on and wanting more within the scenes that follow. He puts many comical and loving scenes in Blood Brothers, also scenes, or incidents, of love and misfortune. Throughout the play, the audience is constantly guessing. There are endless clues as to what happens in the following scenes. One of which is, in the scene where the children are playing, Linda is seen covering mickey so he doesnt get upset. If I were to place the characters in specific positions on the stage, Mickey and Linda would be separate, from the gang, and at the front of the stage, whereas the rest of the children would be in a huddle and more towards the middle and the back of the stage. This would illustrate that Mickey and Linda have an obvious connection, which gives us an idea that there is an intimate occurrence between the two of them, later on in life. This scene also shows the characters playing with toy guns. This could be seen as a bit of an insight, of what is going to happen in the future. When the characters are just young children, they have toy guns and are shooting at each other whilst acting out Cowboys and Indians. Again, this part of the play is showing that it is something that is just for fun, showing that there is nothing serious going on. Some people may look at Blood Brothers as a superstitious play, as when the characters grow in age, they become more and more interested in guns. As a result of this, someone is killed. Some believe this is due to children having guns when they are young and continue to use them, as they get older. Others, however, believe it has nothing to do with that, that it is just by chance that a person may happen to like guns when they are older. Also, some believe it is the background from which the person has come from. When referring to the play, we may be persuaded to believe this last point, and the fact that if you come from a working class background, you are more likely to get yourself into trouble. Although, we may be persuaded that if you have a toy gun from a young age, you are moving on to using bigger, better more realistic guns as you become older. Willy Russell quoted,  I am just not convinced that banning toy guns will do anything towards curbing the aggression in children  This shows that Russell believes that having a toy gun as a child will not affect our later lives. I think he has portrayed this very well in his play, as he hasnt used what he believes, he has left it open to the audience and has let them think of it what they wish.  When Mickey and Linda go to get Edward from his house, we see class division. I would, again, place Mickey and Linda together, yet centre stage and Edward would be seen through an upstairs window. This portrays the class division and shows us that Edwards status level is a lot higher than Mickey and Lindas. Also, complete opposition is shown. .u670808b66d08353cdb8378c03b9caa91 , .u670808b66d08353cdb8378c03b9caa91 .postImageUrl , .u670808b66d08353cdb8378c03b9caa91 .centered-text-area { min-height: 80px; position: relative; } .u670808b66d08353cdb8378c03b9caa91 , .u670808b66d08353cdb8378c03b9caa91:hover , .u670808b66d08353cdb8378c03b9caa91:visited , .u670808b66d08353cdb8378c03b9caa91:active { border:0!important; } .u670808b66d08353cdb8378c03b9caa91 .clearfix:after { content: ""; display: table; clear: both; } .u670808b66d08353cdb8378c03b9caa91 { display: block; transition: background-color 250ms; webkit-transition: background-color 250ms; width: 100%; opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #95A5A6; } .u670808b66d08353cdb8378c03b9caa91:active , .u670808b66d08353cdb8378c03b9caa91:hover { opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #2C3E50; } .u670808b66d08353cdb8378c03b9caa91 .centered-text-area { width: 100%; position: relative ; } .u670808b66d08353cdb8378c03b9caa91 .ctaText { border-bottom: 0 solid #fff; color: #2980B9; font-size: 16px; font-weight: bold; margin: 0; padding: 0; text-decoration: underline; } .u670808b66d08353cdb8378c03b9caa91 .postTitle { color: #FFFFFF; font-size: 16px; font-weight: 600; margin: 0; padding: 0; width: 100%; } .u670808b66d08353cdb8378c03b9caa91 .ctaButton { background-color: #7F8C8D!important; color: #2980B9; border: none; border-radius: 3px; box-shadow: none; font-size: 14px; font-weight: bold; line-height: 26px; moz-border-radius: 3px; text-align: center; text-decoration: none; text-shadow: none; width: 80px; min-height: 80px; background: url(https://artscolumbia.org/wp-content/plugins/intelly-related-posts/assets/images/simple-arrow.png)no-repeat; position: absolute; right: 0; top: 0; } .u670808b66d08353cdb8378c03b9caa91:hover .ctaButton { background-color: #34495E!important; } .u670808b66d08353cdb8378c03b9caa91 .centered-text { display: table; height: 80px; padding-left : 18px; top: 0; } .u670808b66d08353cdb8378c03b9caa91 .u670808b66d08353cdb8378c03b9caa91-content { display: table-cell; margin: 0; padding: 0; padding-right: 108px; position: relative; vertical-align: middle; width: 100%; } .u670808b66d08353cdb8378c03b9caa91:after { content: ""; display: block; clear: both; } READ: February 16, 2001 Bartleby, in Herman Melville's short story Bartleby the Scrivener is a character who lives his life in utter isolation EssayDuring the song that occurs before the fun, play scene, the Narrator is singing and hinting to us that something is going to happen, in the long run, and it isnt going to be good. To create tension, I would position the Narrator behind a brown, wooden table, which would be centre stage. He would be pacing up and down the stage to create the effect that he can see you no matter where you are. The lighting would be dark and eerie, with one constant spotlight; following the Narrator to show he is important and superior. The backdrop wou ld consist of a bridge and the City of Liverpool, showing the audience exactly where the play is set. My Narrator would be in a shirt and bow tie with a long, black, cloak-like coat, to resemble and evil devil, with jet-black trousers, and smart black shoes. He would look smart and nicely finished. When the atmosphere and dialogue is a lot calmer, the bow tie would hang loose and undone and the jacket would be situated on his arm or flung over his shoulder, to create a fun, more lively feel. He would be stood on certain stage blacks to show his different status levels throughout various scenes in the play. This particular play can be seen and read in many different ways. People may refer it to superstition, luck and misfortune or to the fact that if you have ever done something wrong in your life, you will suffer the consequences. There are so many ways to look at this play, but I see it as a very meaningful, heart-warming story. From the way in which the characters are placed, the class divisions are shown, a love story is seen, violence is portrayed and also how divisions and discrimination can effect our lives. From the very beginning, to the very end!

The Real Cause of Terrorism in Palestine

Suicide attacks carried out by Palestinian militant groups had already killed a great number of Israeli soldiers and civilians. This is an act of war. Those who masterminded the attacks said that their actions are justified.Advertising We will write a custom essay sample on The Real Cause of Terrorism in Palestine specifically for you for only $16.05 $11/page Learn More They will continue to fight using unconventional methods until they are able to uproot Israel from Palestine. There are two opposing views as to the real root cause of the attacks. According to Hamas one of the major Palestinian militant groups operating in the area Israel is a threat to their way of life and making them economically weak so that their survival depended on the eradication of the Zionist state from their lands. Morton Klein on the other hand said that the real reason for their hatred stems from religious and nationalistic beliefs. Importance of Issue It is extremely import ant to deal with this issue because of at least three reasons. First, if the claim of Hamas is true then it is ethically wrong to allow a nation to oppress another. Second, the methods used by Palestinian militant groups can be considered as acts of terrorism not to mention that it is an act of war against Israel. Finally, the collateral damage resulting from this conflict is too significant to ignore. Consider the hijackings and suicide bombings directed at Israeli civilians. These acts of terror are not limited on Palestinian soil but in Europe and other parts of the world. The Perspective of Hamas In this article Hamas made a great deal of generalizations and did not delve deeper into the specifics of the issue.Advertising Looking for essay on international relations? Let's see if we can help you! Get your first paper with 15% OFF Learn More Thus, it must be assumed that Hamas was referring to the fact that after World War II the nation of Israel was created overnig ht and for that to happen a portion of Palestine was given to the fledgling state. In the process a great number of Palestinians became refugees overnight. Based on these events it is easier to understand what Hamas is fighting for. Before the coming of Israel, Palestine was under Arab rule or Palestinian rule. They did not have to share it with anyone especially a foreigner like the Israelis. In addition thousands of refugees were forced to leave their homeland and it is indeed a violation of human rights. But after this point, Hamas could not provide any more evidence to their claim that the presence of Israel is disrupting Arab unity and undermining their ability to grow as an economic and military power (Hamas, p.101). Instead of providing evidence to support their claim Hamas began to discuss the need to force Israel out of Palestine using military force. Hamas believed that this is the only viable solution to the problem. Hamas also made the claim that their focus is solely on the removal of the Zionist state in Palestine and nothing more. They have no quarrel with other governments but it is implied that this promise only stands if these governments does not show any form of support for the Zionist state. Klein’s Perspective Morton Klein reacted to the official stance of Hamas that the main reason for their fight against Israel is rooted in economic issues. The author clarified his statement by saying that, â€Å"The historical record clearly demonstrates that Arab extremist ideology, rather than poverty is at the core of Arab-Jewish conflict† (Klein, p.108). Klein proved his point by pointing out that some of the suicide bombers did not come from poor families. Klein also said that Israel did something to improve the economic well-being of Palestine or at least developing the region within the historic Gaza strip.Advertising We will write a custom essay sample on The Real Cause of Terrorism in Palestine specifically for you for only $16.05 $11/page Learn More Klein said that Israel built universities in Judea-Samaria-Gaza (Klein, p.109). Thus, there is no way to prove that Israel wanted them to remain poor and would like to make them feel inferior. But the most interesting thing that Klein said concerns the intense hatred of the Palestinians against Israel to the point that they are willing to bring the war outside Palestine to hurt Israelis and their supporters. This is a clear demonstration that the goal of the Palestinian militant groups is not just to win against the struggle against human rights violations but something more sinister. Klein made it clear that the Palestinian extremist groups wanted Israel decimated. Looking at both perspectives it can be argued that Klein and Hamas agreed on one point only. Both sources are in agreement that one of the main reasons why Palestinian militant groups are in conflict with Israel is due to nationalistic pride. The Palestinians believed t hat their land was stolen from them and that it is their right to reclaim what they have lost with whatever means necessary. But Klein and Hamas disagreed on the other root cause of the conflict. Hamas said it is for economic reasons while Klein said that the evidence point to the contrary. The fighters who joined Hamas are well-educated and they have every reason to live and yet they chose to strap bombs to their bodies and shoot their way to death just to kill a few Israelis. This kind of hatred and this level of dedication is not the by-product of hunger there is another explanation for this intense level of hate.Advertising Looking for essay on international relations? Let's see if we can help you! Get your first paper with 15% OFF Learn More Analysis and Opinion There is only one facet of the issue that can make other people sympathize with Hamas. It is on the issue of human rights violations as the result of the dislocation of families and the creation of nation of refugees when the nation of Israel was established in Palestine. Even if one brings up the historical fact that Israelis used to live in these lands and therefore has the moral right to share the land with present day occupants it is still a valid issue that the refugees should have been treated more kindly by the governments that instituted the creation of a Zionist state. However, it can be argued that it is not the fault of the Israelis that this has happened. Consider that prior to the creation of Israel, six million Jews were killed in the holocaust not to mention the millions of others who were killed in the thousand year persecution of Jews as they left their homeland and were scattered abroad. In addition, the existence of refugees does not justify t he use of suicide bombers to kill innocent civilians. Politicians may have made a mistake but there is no reason for militant groups to kill women and children using violent tactics that produce the most gruesome results. There is a way to address the refugee issue without killing people. In this regard Hamas has to be challenged concerning their claim that Israel is the cause for Arab disunity. If it is true that Arab nations love each other and that there exists a spirit of brotherhood among the Palestinians then why is that Arab nations, specially the neighbors of Israel cannot provide a program to absorb the refugees. If the refugees were absorbed in the 1950s then the problem of poverty and social inequality in the refugee camps should not have existed. There is more. Hamas cannot prove that the fight against Israel is simply limited to their occupation of a piece of land in Palestine. If this is the case then the violence and military action against Israel should have been con ducted within Palestine and ideally within the region where Israel is currently occupying. However, Palestinian extremist groups brought the fight outside their country and they had no qualms in hurting other people that have nothing to do with the conflict. Consider for instance that in 1968 they hijacked an airline from Rome. Surely not all who were on board are from Israel. How can they explain the fact that Palestinian extremist groups disrupted the 1972 Summer Olympics in Munich, Germany? There were many non-Israeli nationals who were negatively affected by the action. It is an act of terror and more importantly it was conducted thousands of miles away from Palestine. It seems very clear that Palestinian extremist groups are not just content to force Israel out of Palestine but they also wanted them destroyed once and for all. Conclusion There is something sinister to the desire of Hamas and other Palestinian extremist groups to destroy Israel as a political entity and as a peo ple. It is terrifying to know that professionals and those that belong to the cream of the crop of Palestinian society are willing to die for a cause. It is a deep sense of patriotism and hatred that stems not from the desire for freedom but a terrible hatred for the Jews. Works Cited Klein, Morton. â€Å"Palestinian Hatred of Israel Causes Terrorism.† Terrorism: Opposing Viewpoints. Ed. Laura Egendorf. MI: Greenhaven Press, 2004. 106-110. Print. Hamas. â€Å"Israel’s Occupation of Palestine Causes Terrorism. Terrorism: Opposing Viewpoints. Ed. Laura Egendorf. MI: Greenhaven Press, 2004. 10-105. Print. This essay on The Real Cause of Terrorism in Palestine was written and submitted by user Ayaan Bruce to help you with your own studies. You are free to use it for research and reference purposes in order to write your own paper; however, you must cite it accordingly. You can donate your paper here.